https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
return true;;
should be
return true;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Dec 21 19:09:42 2018
New Revision: 267337
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267337=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-12-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/87881
* expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #18 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Exactly
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 09:17, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
>
> --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The multiple REF_INQUIRY allowed is just whatever%re%kind or whatever%im%kind,
right (because %re/%im must apply to complex and makes a scalar out of it and
%len needs a character type designator)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #16 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Jakub,
I don't have access to the source until this evening. You, I think,
must be right. I need to use gfc_replace_expr. I'm trying to do many
things at once - this PR has been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Does this do it for you?
Jakub's patch regtested cleanly. I'll test yours later this evening.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Comment on attachment 45258
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45258
A slightly more elaborate version of Jakub's patch
So, what will happen if there is more than one INQUIRY reference?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> Created attachment 45257 [details]
> gcc9-pr87881.patch
>
> Untested fix. simplify_const_ref is similar, but actually iterates p->ref
> and thus properly stops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manfred99 at gmx dot ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Hi Paul,
> I am getting nowhere with this. ...
Did you try to run gfortran under valgrind?
I think there is a latent bug in gfortran that triggers the
==82437==ERROR: AddressSanitizer:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7)
> *** Bug 88068 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Hi Dominique,
I am getting nowhere with this. I have tested everything that I can think of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/duplicate of pr87993 and pr87994.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/duplicate of pr87945?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Dominique,
I am just back from a business trip to the US. I will attend to this bug asap.
Thanks
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> First, I have tested the patch at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44892
> with the test in pr40196 comment 9 without seeing any problem.
> So it seems that the problem has been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Dominique,
When you have a moment, could you do a bit of diagnosis for me please? I
presume that the ICE is caused by the neglect of a pointer that is sometimes
null but which FC28 passes over. A debug
21 matches
Mail list logo
