https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88579
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88579
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 22 21:23:57 2019
New Revision: 268163
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268163=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-01-22 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/88579
* trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88579
--- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf ---
Patch submitted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg00163.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88579
--- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf ---
Suggested testcase for the patch in comment #1, derived from power_7.f90:
! { dg-do run }
! { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-original" }
! Test optimizations for bases that are powers of 2.
program p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88579
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88579
--- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf ---
OK, here's my proof-of-concept patch (not cleaned up):
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(revision 267353)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88579
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
Target
