https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89291
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89291
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89291
--- Comment #5 from zwieflhofer ---
Yes, I did provided NCAR with the URL to this bug-id but no response so far.
I did not try the 8.2 trunk - sort of assuming that NCAR will do so anyway in
due course as part of their standard release testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89291
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Installed gcc-5.5.0 and built the identical WRF version.
>
> No ICE encountered with 5.5.0.
Then if you get an ICE with 7.4, it a regression. Did you try 8.2 or trunk.
> Contacted NCAR, the provid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89291
--- Comment #3 from zwieflhofer ---
Contacted NCAR, the providers of the source code. The bug is known to them and
they have a workaround:
Set
-DBUILD_RRTMG_FAST=0
to
-DBUILD_RRTMG_FAST=1
From my side, this bug report can be closed.
But I ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89291
--- Comment #2 from zwieflhofer ---
Installed gcc-5.5.0 and built the identical WRF version.
No ICE encountered with 5.5.0.
Attempted to extract a reduced test version but this is non-trivial due to the
large source code base and complex make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89291
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
