[Bug fortran/89646] [7/8/9 Regression] Spurious actual argument might interfere warning

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89646

--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> I meant "replace the 0".

The replacement could be OPT_Wsurprising (-Wsurprising, included in -Wall) or
OPT_Wextra (-Wextra) or yet a new option.

The warning is tested in gfortran.dg/elemental_dependency_1.f90.

[Bug fortran/89646] [7/8/9 Regression] Spurious actual argument might interfere warning

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89646

--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> The warning is unconditional, but it should be easy to replace the 9 
> with some suitable option.

I meant "replace the 0".

[Bug fortran/89646] [7/8/9 Regression] Spurious actual argument might interfere warning

[tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89646

Thomas Koenig  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|--- |7.5
Summary|Spurious actual argument|[7/8/9 Regression] Spurious
   |might interfere warning |actual argument might
   ||interfere warning