[Bug fortran/92113] [8 regression] r276673 causes segfault in gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90

2019-10-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Still having no luck trying to find out which patch made this error not appear on trunk. I think this may actually depend on the version of the bootstrapping compiler :-( In the meantime, here is the first

[Bug fortran/92113] [8 regression] r276673 causes segfault in gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90

2019-10-25 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/92113] [8 regression] r276673 causes segfault in gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90

2019-10-19 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- I don't understand that Fortran code correctly, but it seems to me that ARTIFICIAL code is the correct one, so you shouldn't have reverted this patch, and that may just be a red herring even?

[Bug fortran/92113] [8 regression] r276673 causes segfault in gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90

2019-10-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/92113] [8 regression] r276673 causes segfault in gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90

2019-10-16 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/92113] [8 regression] r276673 causes segfault in gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90

2019-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.0 Target Milestone|---