[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #13 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- committed to master and backported
[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e211b3da3899b3496add56ba45acb07569e7c15a commit r9-8632-ge211b3da3899b3496add56ba45acb07569e7c15a Author: Mark Eggleston Date: Wed Apr 1 09:52:41 2020 +0100 Fortran : "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" spurious syntax error PR94397 Based on a patch in the comments of the PR. That patch fixed this problem but caused the test cases for PR93484 to fail. It has been changed to reduce initialisation expressions if the expression is not EXPR_VARIABLE and not EXPR_CONSTANT. 2020-05-28 Steven G. Kargl Mark Eggleston gcc/fortran/ PR fortran/94397 * match.c (gfc_match_type_spec): New variable ok initialised to true. Set ok with the return value of gfc_reduce_init_expr called only if the expression is not EXPR_CONSTANT and is not EXPR_VARIABLE. Add !ok to the check for type not being integer or the rank being greater than zero. 2020-05-28 Mark Eggleston gcc/testsuite/ PR fortran/94397 * gfortran.dg/pr94397.F90: New test. (cherry picked from commit 3ea6977d0f1813d982743a09660eec1760e981ec)
[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2fe2ad8d379297dcf571b2b9c46200c5ae5391f commit r10-8200-gf2fe2ad8d379297dcf571b2b9c46200c5ae5391f Author: Mark Eggleston Date: Wed Apr 1 09:52:41 2020 +0100 Fortran : "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" spurious syntax error PR94397 Based on a patch in the comments of the PR. That patch fixed this problem but caused the test cases for PR93484 to fail. It has been changed to reduce initialisation expressions if the expression is not EXPR_VARIABLE and not EXPR_CONSTANT. 2020-05-28 Steven G. Kargl Mark Eggleston gcc/fortran/ PR fortran/94397 * match.c (gfc_match_type_spec): New variable ok initialised to true. Set ok with the return value of gfc_reduce_init_expr called only if the expression is not EXPR_CONSTANT and is not EXPR_VARIABLE. Add !ok to the check for type not being integer or the rank being greater than zero. 2020-05-28 Mark Eggleston gcc/testsuite/ PR fortran/94397 * gfortran.dg/pr94397.F90: New test. (cherry picked from commit 3ea6977d0f1813d982743a09660eec1760e981ec)
[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea6977d0f1813d982743a09660eec1760e981ec commit r11-693-g3ea6977d0f1813d982743a09660eec1760e981ec Author: Mark Eggleston Date: Wed Apr 1 09:52:41 2020 +0100 Fortran : "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" spurious syntax error PR94397 Based on a patch in the comments of the PR. That patch fixed this problem but caused the test cases for PR93484 to fail. It has been changed to reduce initialisation expressions if the expression is not EXPR_VARIABLE and not EXPR_CONSTANT. 2020-05-28 Steven G. Kargl Mark Eggleston gcc/fortran/ PR fortran/94397 * match.c (gfc_match_type_spec): New variable ok initialised to true. Set ok with the return value of gfc_reduce_init_expr called only if the expression is not EXPR_CONSTANT and is not EXPR_VARIABLE. Add !ok to the check for type not being integer or the rank being greater than zero. 2020-05-28 Mark Eggleston gcc/testsuite/ PR fortran/94397 * gfortran.dg/pr94397.F90: New test.
[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.0|10.2 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 10.1 has been released.
