[Bug gcov-profile/85351] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with exit() executed in a if statement within a called function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |---
[Bug gcov-profile/85351] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with exit() executed in a if statement within a called function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
[Bug gcov-profile/85351] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with exit() executed in a if statement within a called function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
[Bug gcov-profile/85351] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with exit() executed in a if statement within a called function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #5 from Fangrui Song --- I am a bit curious how GCC instruments such functions which may alter control flows * exit/execve/execl/etc * fork * functions which may throw or call any above functions If you force a split basic block after such functions, you get counts correct but you pay the costs that there is one more basic block and two more arcs. In -fprofile-arcs you need to pay the instrumentation cost of one arc (after taking into account of the Kirchhoff circuit law's spanning tree optimization). If you assume every external function call may alter control flows, you pay rather large overhead for things you probably care little (since I know some underlying mechanism I don't trust line counts after special functions).
[Bug gcov-profile/85351] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with exit() executed in a if statement within a called function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 9.3.0 has been released, adjusting target milestone.
[Bug gcov-profile/85351] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with exit() executed in a if statement within a called function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.2 |9.3 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 9.2 has been released.
[Bug gcov-profile/85351] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with exit() executed in a if statement within a called function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 9.1 has been released.
[Bug gcov-profile/85351] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with exit() executed in a if statement within a called function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, it's really small issue.
