http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60288
Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60288
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
So it looks like gccgo reads the expression as
(*pg)(0)
I meant
- (*(g))(0)
while golang reads it as
*(pg(0))
- *((g(0)))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60288
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
I don't think there is any parsing issue with the omitted error on line 5.
It's just that gccgo converts *x to x for any x, and forgets to test that x
must be addressable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60288
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Feb 20 15:20:26 2014
New Revision: 207960
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207960root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/60288
compiler: Avoid crash, give
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60288
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
