[Bug go/68931] gccgo fails to build using MUSL libc

2021-12-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68931 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/68931] gccgo fails to build using MUSL libc

2020-10-17 Thread daniel.santos at pobox dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68931 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Santos --- Created attachment 49393 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49393=edit Patch for musl compatibility The root problem is that musl defines off64_t and loff_t as preprocessor macros. These

[Bug go/68931] gccgo fails to build using MUSL libc

2020-10-17 Thread daniel.santos at pobox dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68931 Daniel Santos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.santos at pobox dot com ---

[Bug go/68931] gccgo fails to build using MUSL libc

2019-04-24 Thread daniel.santos at pobox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68931 Daniel Santos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.santos at pobox dot com ---

[Bug go/68931] gccgo fails to build using MUSL libc

2015-12-16 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68931 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I don't understand your patch, because I don't understand where CONFIG_USE_MUSL gets set. It also seems like the wrong approach. The basic goal of configure tests is to test for features, not systems.

[Bug go/68931] gccgo fails to build using MUSL libc

2015-12-16 Thread gccbugzilla at daniel dot thecshore.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68931 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Dickinson --- Sorry, the patch wasn't intended for inclusion as is; it is a patch I made for OpenWrt (which has a configuration option CONFIG_USE_MUSL that is available to the top-level Makefile). The error that