--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-07 10:11 ---
Well, it probably failed before with -funroll-loops. Why's the cpuid functions
not marked with noinline?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44018
--- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-05-07 12:19 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Well, it probably failed before with -funroll-loops. Why's the cpuid
functions
not marked with noinline?
Because it is only one instruction?
--
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-07 13:08 ---
For some reason, when I change it to C, it compiles.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from lloyd at randombit dot net 2010-05-06 22:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=20591)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20591action=view)
Testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44018
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-07 00:29 ---
It is triggered by revision 147395:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00369.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
