[Bug inline-asm/62144] "Frame pointer required, but reserved" error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2018-12-25 Thread coypu at sdf dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 coypu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||coypu at sdf dot org --- Comment #10 from coypu

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2014-10-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2014-10-29 Thread luk32 at o2 dot pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 --- Comment #8 from Łukasz Kucharski luk32 at o2 dot pl --- Jakub, fair enough. However, changing the optimization level should not break the compilation. The issue is, at least for me, is not that we can't omit the frame pointer, but that it

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2014-10-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- The documentation on -fomit-frame-pointer says: Don't keep the frame pointer in a register for functions that don't need one. where whether soemthing needs a frame pointer or not is

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2014-10-28 Thread luk32 at o2 dot pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 Łukasz Kucharski luk32 at o2 dot pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luk32 at o2 dot pl

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2014-10-28 Thread luk32 at o2 dot pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 --- Comment #6 from Łukasz Kucharski luk32 at o2 dot pl --- Comment on attachment 33833 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33833 Example program that fails compilation with optimization enabled. Hello, I believe we run into

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2014-09-30 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Brooks Moses from comment #2) Ping? Any updates on this? Sorry, I'll look at this in a week or if I am lucky this week. Right now, I am quite busy with register

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2014-09-30 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 --- Comment #4 from Brooks Moses brooks at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks. I have to admit that that does seem more generally useful! :)

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2014-09-29 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 --- Comment #2 from Brooks Moses brooks at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ping? Any updates on this?

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2014-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last