[Bug ipa/111571] [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

2024-04-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571

--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca56b43105fc09021ec445f1978a17cd85ae5e0c

commit r14-9794-gca56b43105fc09021ec445f1978a17cd85ae5e0c
Author: Martin Jambor 
Date:   Thu Apr 4 22:46:16 2024 +0200

ipa: Avoid duplicate replacements in IPA-SRA transformation phase

When the analysis part of IPA-SRA figures out that it would split out
a scalar part of an aggregate which is known by IPA-CP to contain a
known constant, it skips it knowing that the transformation part looks
at IPA-CP aggregate results too and does the right thing (which can
include doing the propagation in GIMPLE because that is the last
moment the parameter exists).

However, when IPA-SRA wants to split out a smaller aggregate out
of an aggregate, which happens to be of the same size as a known
scalar constant at the same offset, the transformation bit fails to
recognize the situation, tries to do both splitting and constant
propagation and in PR 111571 testcase creates a nonsensical call
statement on which the call redirection then ICEs.

Fixed by making sure we don't try to do two replacements of the same
part of the same parameter.

The look-up among replacements requires these are sorted and this
patch just sorts them if they are not already sorted before each new
look-up.  The worst number of sortings that can happen is number of
parameters which are both split and have aggregate constants times
param_ipa_max_agg_items (default 16).  I don't think complicating the
source code to optimize for this unlikely case is worth it but if need
be, it can of course be done.

gcc/ChangeLog:

2024-03-15  Martin Jambor  

PR ipa/111571
* ipa-param-manipulation.cc
(ipa_param_body_adjustments::common_initialization): Avoid creating
duplicate replacement entries.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2024-03-15  Martin Jambor  

PR ipa/111571
* gcc.dg/ipa/pr111571.c: New test.

[Bug ipa/111571] [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

2024-03-15 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571

--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor  ---
I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ri6r0gbwf7l@virgil.suse.cz/T/#u

[Bug ipa/111571] [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

2024-03-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
   Priority|P1  |P2

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
GCC 13.{1,2} has been released with this bug, so P2.

[Bug ipa/111571] [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

2024-03-07 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571

Jeffrey A. Law  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
   Priority|P3  |P1

[Bug ipa/111571] [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

2023-11-02 Thread noamlewis at google dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571

Noam Lewis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||noamlewis at google dot com

--- Comment #2 from Noam Lewis  ---
Not sure if same bug or different, we encountered this:

gcc (Debian 13.2.0-4) 13.2.0

$ cat /tmp/example.c 
typedef struct {
} a;
struct b {
  short c
};
struct d e;
struct d {
  struct {
struct b f
  }
} inline g(struct b h) {
  i();
  fn3();
  e.f = h;
  return e;
}
typedef struct {
  int n;
  int j;
  struct b k;
  a l
} m;
static o(m h) {
  p(h.n, h.l, 1);
  g(h.k);
}
q() {
  struct b r = {};
  o((m){.2, .1, r, {}});
}

$ gcc-13 /tmp/example.c -O2 -c  -w -freport-bug
during IPA pass: inline
/tmp/example.c: In function ‘q’:
/tmp/example.c:29:3: internal compiler error: in modify_call, at
ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656
   29 |   o((m){.2, .1, r, {}});
  |   ^
0x7fb9b73666c9 __libc_start_call_main
../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
0x7fb9b7366784 __libc_start_main_impl
../csu/libc-start.c:360
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See  for instructions.
The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem.

[Bug ipa/111571] [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
   Target Milestone|--- |13.3