[Bug ipa/69044] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: in duplicate_thunk_for_node

2016-01-11 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69044 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 11 10:09:17 2016 New Revision: 232215 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232215=gcc=rev Log: [PR ipa/69044] Do not clone for param removal when not possible 2016-01-11

[Bug ipa/69044] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: in duplicate_thunk_for_node

2016-01-11 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69044 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/69044] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: in duplicate_thunk_for_node

2016-01-08 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69044 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- OK, so after looking into this (and CHKP) a bit more, this is only one of many issues with costant propagating into CHKP functions and thunks. In fact, there is an attempt to disable that in

[Bug ipa/69044] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: in duplicate_thunk_for_node

2016-01-07 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69044 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/69044] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: in duplicate_thunk_for_node

2016-01-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69044 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|

[Bug ipa/69044] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: in duplicate_thunk_for_node

2016-01-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69044 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1