http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-02-18 17:03:18 UTC ---
There are therefore no requirements on the processor for this
program, and it may produce either output, or even a runtime error.
If accepted, this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-12
09:07:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #12)
Did any interpretation requests go in on this and did we get an answer back?
Thanks to Van and Dan,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10
08:45:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Did any interpretation requests go in on this and did we get an answer back?
No, but I just wrote one:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10
19:32:46 UTC ---
It twists my mind too, I meant 4.5, not 4.6, I don't have a working 4.6 here at
the moment. Thanks for doing the interp request. I hope this turns into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10
00:40:55 UTC ---
Did any interpretation requests go in on this and did we get an answer back?
I am leaning toward current 4.7 is OK and 4.6 has the regression.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-22
03:37:30 UTC ---
I just returned from travel and will have a look at this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-19
10:34:13 UTC ---
A simple (partial) revert of the patch of PR 47285
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00226.html) will lead to wrong
results as one does not honour the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
13 matches
Mail list logo
