https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948
--- Comment #7 from Bill Long ---
Thanks - very helpful information. I'll try to find out what version of gcc
was used to build their library.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Note that I got a
Internal Error: stash_internal_unit(): Stack Size Exceeded
when using mismatched gfortran 7.2.0 and omp_lib.mod.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948
--- Comment #5 from Bill Long ---
I tried on my Mac laptop (gcc version 6.3.0) and it also works there. Evidently
not a representative test. The differences I see between that environment and
the original customer's is that they are running
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> What happens with 16 threads?
% gfc -fopenmp pr83948.f90
% setenv OMP_NUM_THREADS 16
% ./a.out
Table element number = 995 Same pole re-projecting area source:
Beginnng of new record:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948
--- Comment #3 from Bill Long ---
What happens with 16 threads?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948
--- Comment #1 from Bill Long ---
The same code compiles and executes OK at 20 threads with other compilers. The
size of the internal file is small (700 bytes).
