[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

2011-12-08 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #8 from gee 2011-12-08 18:49:10 UTC --- Created attachment 26028 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26028 generated rtl from gnu.zip /tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe -fno-shrink-wrap -quiet -fhash-synchronizat

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

2011-12-08 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #7 from gee 2011-12-08 18:47:29 UTC --- Created attachment 26027 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26027 generated tree from gnu.zip /tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe -fhash-synchronization -fuse-divide-subrou

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

2011-12-08 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #6 from gee 2011-12-08 18:45:46 UTC --- Created attachment 26026 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26026 generated zip file

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

2011-10-23 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #5 from gee 2011-10-23 13:42:43 UTC --- maybe this is related to x86_this_parameter in gcc/config/i386/i386.c it might tell why caller push parameter to stack, whereas function prologue treats first parameter is in %ecx when MS_ABI is

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

2011-10-22 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #4 from gee 2011-10-22 19:33:19 UTC --- ;; ;; Full RTL generated for this function: ;; (note 1 0 4 NOTE_INSN_DELETED) (note 4 1 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) (insn 2 4 3 2 (set (reg/f:SI 61 [ this ]) (reg:SI 2 cx [ this ]

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

2011-10-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

2011-08-12 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #3 from gee 2011-08-12 11:44:58 UTC --- using only '-fno-ipa-sra -fno-ipa-cp' didn't work too. Reading symbols from /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/java/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-gij...done. (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/java/bin/i686

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

2011-08-12 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-08-12 08:59:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Try to build everything with -fno-ipa-sra -fno-ipa-cp. I understand what you meant is "append -fno-ipa-sra -fno-ipa-cp to {C,CXX,GCJ}FLAGS when building libgcj"

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

2011-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

2011-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-12 08:27:30 UTC --- Try to build everything with -fno-ipa-sra -fno-ipa-cp.