https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
--- Comment #13 from Arsen Arsenović ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
> I suppose we could enable if hosted || newlib, but that wouldn't
> always be right because (IIUC) you can configure newlib without any of the
> libm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #10)
> (In reply to lesto fante from comment #9)
> > In pure freestanding, I would expect smart pointer and at least parts cmath
> > to work; the compiler offer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #11 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
--- Comment #10 from Arsen Arsenović ---
(In reply to lesto fante from comment #9)
> To be fair I have no idea what would be the impact of removing freestanding,
> from a quick test does not seems to have a realistic impact.
>
> I guess what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
--- Comment #9 from lesto fante ---
To be fair I have no idea what would be the impact of removing freestanding,
from a quick test does not seems to have a realistic impact.
I guess what happen here is that the freestanding option should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #7)
> the thing with newlib in particular is that it's not really freestanding..
> it lives in an odd limbo between a full hosted OS and 'real' freestanding
> with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks for the extra info.
I don't think it's really _forbidden_, but not a use case I was really aware
of, and didn't realise it's something we might need to support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
--- Comment #5 from lesto fante ---
> Presumably you're using newlib to provide the libm functions that
> declares?
newlib-nano, trough the "-specs=nano.specs".
Removing -ffreestanding in my project caused a decrease(!) in code size (42008
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to lesto fante from comment #0)
> My code stop compiling after updating from
> arm-none-eabi-gcc (Arch Repository) 12.2.0
> to
> arm-none-eabi-gcc (Arch Repository) 13.1.0
> (cant easily test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-11
Known to work|
12 matches
Mail list logo
