--- Comment #16 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 20:00 ---
Subject: Bug 24692
Author: paolo
Date: Mon May 29 20:00:29 2006
New Revision: 114215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114215
Log:
2006-05-29 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #17 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-05-29 20:01 ---
Fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 20:21
---
Any news on this bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24692
--- Comment #13 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-05-21 20:30 ---
No news about this one. Frankly, since x86-* would not benefit in any way, I
consider the work low priority.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24692
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 20:33
---
(In reply to comment #13)
No news about this one. Frankly, since x86-* would not benefit in any way, I
consider the work low priority.
What about x86_64 or even PowerPC64 both of which are becoming more popular
--- Comment #15 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-05-21 20:36 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
No news about this one. Frankly, since x86-* would not benefit in any way, I
consider the work low priority.
What about x86_64
Of course by x86-* I meant to
--- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-11-08 10:58 ---
Ok, apparently short-term at least, smart solutions using libgcc and dynamic
linking will not be implemented (one blocker are systems using a static
libgcc.a).
Therefore this one becomes a pure libstdc++-v3 PR. Then what
--- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-11-08 13:37 ---
Changing the declarations in include/bits/atomicity.h to inline definitions
forwarding to the builtins and including bits/atomic_word.h instead of
bits/atomicity.h in config/cpu/*/atomicity.h for the supported arch
