http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33935
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-18
10:08:22 UTC ---
*** Bug 49020 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33935
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-17
12:22:25 UTC ---
*** Bug 49020 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-14 20:47
---
Let's keep this one open instead, as a reminder that the libcs of non-GNU
targets have to provide a mechanism similar to the one used by recent glibcs:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=14377
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-01-30 12:08
---
This is really the same as libstdc++/30928.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30928 ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-02 22:25 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-29 01:09 ---
Yes, in some sense the resolution of DR 456 doesn't consider strchr and co.
Some time ago I mentioned that in private email with Howard but then didn't
really pursue it. Will do, maybe at one of the next C++ meetings.
--
