--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-13 17:36 ---
Subject: Bug 35541
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Mar 13 17:35:40 2008
New Revision: 133173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=133173
Log:
2008-03-13 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-13 17:36 ---
Subject: Bug 35541
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Mar 13 17:36:02 2008
New Revision: 133174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=133174
Log:
2008-03-13 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #1 from dominik dot strasser at onespin-solutions dot com
2008-03-11 16:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=15299)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15299action=view)
Source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35541
--- Comment #2 from chris at bubblescope dot net 2008-03-11 17:08 ---
This used to work (works on Apple's gcc 4.0.1).
The bug is an inconsistency between __check_sorted_set on lines 317 and 334 and
the __check_sorted_set_aux on the lines before
The 4 __check_sorted_set_aux methods
--- Comment #3 from chris at bubblescope dot net 2008-03-11 17:12 ---
While I'm sure he will be along soon anyway, I shall add Paolo to the CC list
of this bug.
It looks to me like a simple typo was made while fixing 34730.
--
chris at bubblescope dot net changed:
What
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-03-11 21:52 ---
Yes, it's a trivial issue, sorry about that. I think the third parameter of the
*_sorted_set_aux functions can be simply removed. Anyway, I'll fix it ASAP.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What
