--- Comment #18 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 21:36 ---
fixed for 4.4.x/4.3.x
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #17 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 21:32 ---
Subject: Bug 36801
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon Jan 12 21:32:19 2009
New Revision: 143310
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143310
Log:
2009-01-12 Benjamin Kosnik
Jonathan Larmour
--- Comment #16 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 20:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=17080)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17080&action=view)
for gcc-4_3-branch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36801
--- Comment #15 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-08 03:15 ---
Subject: Bug 36801
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Jan 8 03:14:24 2009
New Revision: 143182
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143182
Log:
2009-01-07 Benjamin Kosnik
Jonathan Larmour
--- Comment #14 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-01-07 18:17
---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Note that my original patch also included a trivial fix for concurrence.h
> where
> __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION was called when it should have been
> __GTHREAD_COND_INIT_FUNCTION
--- Comment #13 from jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2009-01-07 18:03
---
The patch seems to be ok from my cursory checking, thanks!
Note that my original patch also included a trivial fix for concurrence.h where
__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION was called when it should have been
__GTHRE
--- Comment #12 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-07 09:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=17043)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17043&action=view)
plus mt_allocator fixes
This fixes these longstanding fails on darwin:
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_
--- Comment #11 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-07 03:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=17042)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17042&action=view)
patch version 2
Hey! Sorry about the delay on this. Please try the attached patch, and let me
know if it works f
--- Comment #10 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-07 03:40 ---
Mine.
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-17 17:21
---
Benjamin, any feedback on this? Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36801
--- Comment #8 from jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2008-10-30 13:10
---
Hi Benjamin, the copyright assignment is definitely sorted, and can be seen on
copyright.list on fencepost.gnu.org now.
Any reason for this not to go in (although I don't have commit perms)? Would it
better for me
--- Comment #7 from jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2008-10-04 02:54
---
To avoid any uncertainty, I arranged a copyright assignment. Unfortunately the
FSF's copyright clerk left and there was a gap before the replacement started,
but it just so happens that today he confirmed the assig
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-10-03 22:42
---
Benjamin, any feedback on this? Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36801
--- Comment #5 from jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2008-07-15 01:19
---
Created an attachment (id=15909)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15909&action=view)
Patch against 4.3.1 using a once variable to ensure safe initialisation
Here's a patch, let me know what you
--- Comment #4 from jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2008-07-12 01:53
---
I can't really work out how to provide a testcase as such. To reproduce it all
I'm doing is:
#include
#include
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
std::cout << "Hello world" << std::endl;
return 0;
}
The
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 20:53 ---
Hey Jonathan.
It would be most helpful if you could come up with a test case. I know, it will
be a pain and difficult, etc etc etc yadda yadda yadda, but really this would
be enormously helpful.
Instead of putting t
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-11 13:36
---
CCing Benjamin...
By the way, if the patch would be very short, the full Assignment would not be
needed...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #1 from jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2008-07-11 13:03
---
On thinking about this a bit more, I think this would be a regression for the
case where __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT is used. In the case of
__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION, I believe the previous implementation was also
su
18 matches
Mail list logo
