https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39909
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.1
--- Comment #9 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-05-05 22:14
---
Fixed for 4.5.0 and 4.4.1
--
jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 21:44 ---
Subject: Bug 39909
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 5 21:44:27 2009
New Revision: 147138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147138
Log:
2009-05-05 Jonathan Wakely
PR libstdc++/39909
*
--- Comment #7 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 21:33 ---
Subject: Bug 39909
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 5 21:32:38 2009
New Revision: 147137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147137
Log:
2009-05-05 Jonathan Wakely
PR libstdc++/39909
*
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-04-29 09:17
---
Jon, patch looks generally good to me, can you please send it to the mailing
list for higher visibility? Then we can commit it and close this annoying issue
once and for all ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #5 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 21:39
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> same patch again, with the new symbols using a new version and testsuite
> changes included
passes all regression tests both with and without tls
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 18:06
---
Created an attachment (id=17709)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17709&action=view)
use GLIBCXX_3.4.12 version for new symbols
same patch again, with the new symbols using a new version and te
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last re
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-04-26 17:53
---
Thanks Jon, for following up about this. Let's try to close the issue during
the next days...
About 3.4.12, it's just matter of manually editing gnu.ver, adding the block +
manually adding GLIBCXX_3.4.12 to te
--- Comment #2 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-04-26 17:40
---
Created an attachment (id=17707)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17707&action=view)
fix call_once without breaking ABI
Fix call_once to not use the global lock object, but retain the global fo
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-04-26 14:28
---
Just in case Chris wants to help with this.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
