http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43738
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-02 13:15:18
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Dec 2 13:15:10 2010
New Revision: 167369
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167369
Log:
2010-12-02 Kai Tietz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43738
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Comment #14 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-08-13 18:00
---
Dave, any news on this? Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43738
--- Comment #13 from sherpya at netfarm dot it 2010-04-22 15:31 ---
I can build 4.5.0 without problems, I think here no source is pulling in
winsock header
--
sherpya at netfarm dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-20 21:26
---
Dave, can I assign this to you?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43738
--- Comment #11 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-21 02:17 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Dave, can I assign this to you?
Probably not now I beat you to it! Will take me a day or three to get round
to.
--
davek at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-21 03:36
---
Many thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43738
--- Comment #6 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2010-04-15
07:54 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
FIONREAD is defined by winsock header
How come your build of basic_file_stdio includes winsock api headers?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43738
--- Comment #7 from sherpya at netfarm dot it 2010-04-15 10:03 ---
the correct way should be
#if defined(FIONREAD) !defined(_WIN32)
or if you prefer __MINGW32__
(note _WIN32 is not defined on cygwin)
ioctlsocket is not suitable because it does not work on file descriptors
also it
--- Comment #8 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-15 10:13 ---
Mid-air collision!
Mid-air collision detected!
:)
(In reply to comment #5)
I remember correctly), I wonder whether we should simply special case mingw32
and conditional to the macro being defined
Yeah, that
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-15 16:04
---
Agreed, if ioctlsocket can't really replace ioctl, let's just explicitly #if
out the affected targets for now. We can still improve it later.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43738
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-15 00:55
---
Dave, any idea? For sure nobody reported build problems so far, and that code
is *very* old...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-15 01:03 ---
Is this a combined-tree build? Sounds like:
http://www.mail-archive.com/g...@gcc.gnu.org/msg27284.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43738
--- Comment #4 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-15 01:17 ---
So the ideal fix would be to change #ifdef FIONREAD to something more like
#if HAVE_IOCTL defined (FIONREAD). But that runs into the need-link-test
vs. cross-configure problem.
MinGW doesn't have sys/ioctl.h; could
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-15 03:09
---
(In reply to comment #4)
MinGW doesn't have sys/ioctl.h; could we test HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H? Are there
likely to be any platforms we support that define FIONREAD but don't have
sys/ioctl.h?
Dave, if you look
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
Version|unknown |4.3.0
--- Comment #1 from sherpya at netfarm dot it 2010-04-12 23:36 ---
FIONREAD is defined by winsock header
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43738
17 matches
Mail list logo
