http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #38 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 17:01:39 UTC ---
--- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07
09:22:29 UTC ---
Rainer, you should now be able to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #39 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 18:10:19
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Feb 10 18:10:12 2012
New Revision: 184108
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184108
Log:
Use __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #36 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07
09:19:35 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Feb 7 09:19:27 2012
New Revision: 183955
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183955
Log:
libgcc/
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|redi at gcc dot gnu.org |ro at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #32 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-03
08:50:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 26559
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26559
proposed patch
Since a similar problem exists for darwin11's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #33 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-03
08:52:17 UTC ---
Oops, this hunk would be needed too
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/condition_variable.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/condition_variable.cc
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #34 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-03 09:48:15 UTC ---
Since a similar problem exists for darwin11's
PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER this solution is not OSF-specific. This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #35 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-03 09:50:39 UTC ---
--- Comment #33 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-03
08:52:17 UTC ---
Oops, this hunk would be needed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-01 10:23:33 UTC ---
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31
19:09:00 UTC ---
(N.B. that ChangeLog entry cited
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #28 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31 11:40:21
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Jan 31 11:40:17 2012
New Revision: 183754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183754
Log:
Link C++ tests with -shared-libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31
19:09:00 UTC ---
(N.B. that ChangeLog entry cited the wrong PR)
The wording quoted in comment 25 is a POSIX defect:
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=70#c127
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-16 18:58:20 UTC ---
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13
10:37:52 UTC ---
Nice digging. POSIX does say the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-16
19:36:49 UTC ---
C++11 requires that std::mutex::mutex() is constexpr, so that a global
std::mutex will be statically initialized. If that constructor is constexpr it
can't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-13 10:25:34 UTC ---
I've done some more digging and found that the EINVAL error is generated
inside libpthread.so, by a function called
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13
10:37:52 UTC ---
Nice digging. POSIX does say the INIT macro is for use when the mutex is
statically-allocated:
In cases where default mutex attributes are appropriate, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #21 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-12 15:47:53 UTC ---
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-11
17:48:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
I've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-12
16:16:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
The std/mutex change is a hack to avoid
In file included from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-12 18:17:56 UTC ---
Does adding 'noexcept' to ~__mutex_base() make that hack unnecessary?
The destructor should be implicitly noexcept, but G++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-11
16:50:09 UTC ---
Regarding the remaining failures, it appears to be a front-end issue. Fixing it
in the library could be done with an autoconf macro to detect that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-11 17:37:59 UTC ---
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-11
16:50:09 UTC ---
Regarding the remaining failures,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-11
17:48:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
I've just tried it with the vendor cxx (first disabling noexcept for C++
2011), and it also fails with EINVAL.
Well that's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-28 12:42:17 UTC ---
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-26
15:18:40 UTC ---
Does this reduced test work with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28
14:22:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-26
15:18:40 UTC ---
Does this reduced test work with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-28 14:34:38 UTC ---
Does this work?
No, I still get EINVAL.
Otherwise I suppose we must not define __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT on Tru64, causing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28
14:40:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
The strange thing is that is seems to have worked so far without issues,
e.g. in emutls.c.
and in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-26
15:15:26 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Nov 26 15:15:22 2011
New Revision: 181740
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181740
Log:
PR libstdc++/51296
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-26
15:18:40 UTC ---
Does this reduced test work with -std=gnu++11 -pthread ?
#include stdio.h
#include string.h
#include pthread.h
struct M {
pthread_mutex_t m =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-25 14:04:26 UTC ---
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-24
19:26:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-25 14:06:10 UTC ---
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-24
20:30:43 UTC ---
What does this program do, compiled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-25 14:12:25 UTC ---
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-25 14:06:10 UTC ---
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-25
14:46:07 UTC ---
Thanks for the info - that error implies the mutex was not correctly
initialized.
What are these macros defined to (if defined)?
__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-25
14:46:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT
__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT
sorry, ignore the double-paste ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-25 14:57:24 UTC ---
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-25
14:46:07 UTC ---
Thanks for the info - that error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-25
15:17:09 UTC ---
ah so the scan-assembler test is finding the stabs info, not actually a call to
the constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-25 15:55:36 UTC ---
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-25
15:17:09 UTC ---
ah so the scan-assembler test is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-24
19:26:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
FAIL: 30_threads/thread/native_handle/typesizes.cc execution test
This one should definitely not run on Tru64, disabling that is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-24
20:30:43 UTC ---
What does this program do, compiled with -std=c++11 -pthread ?
#include mutex
#include system_error
#include assert.h
#define VERIFY assert
int main()
{
40 matches
Mail list logo
