http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #38 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-08
17:03:39 UTC ---
I assume the option of using...
Index: libstdc++-v3/config/os/bsd/darwin/os_defines.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #39 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
17:16:13 UTC ---
Yes, but why do you want to disable it?
Why does that patch define _GLIBCXX_USE_SCHED_YIELD?
That is correctly detected anyway by configure, without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #40 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-08 18:33:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
N.B. prior to POSIX 2008 nanosleep was part of the Timers option, if OS X
supports that it should define
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #41 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
19:50:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #40)
I still don't see why the _POSIX_TIMERS 0 check exists at all. On systems
that don't have it, the tests will simply fail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #42 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-08 20:10:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)
(In reply to comment #40)
I still don't see why the _POSIX_TIMERS 0 check exists at all. On systems
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #43 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-08
20:31:01 UTC ---
Both OpenBSD and FreeBSD seem to have nanosleep calls documented as...
The nanosleep() function conforms to IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (``POSIX'')
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #44 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
20:42:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #42)
You want to find an test such that:
(your test) = (nanosleep is the one you want)
That's why I was asking about
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #45 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-08
22:27:08 UTC ---
I can confirm the existence of sched_yield() back to Libc-166 in 1997 on
darwin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #46 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-09
00:46:08 UTC ---
Revised patch posted to libstdc++ mailing list...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2012-10/msg00047.html
12 matches
Mail list logo
