--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
fixed - probably not worth backporting since noone has noticed it's missing
For what it's worth, at least one of your users (me) has noticed this.
I'll restructure code as necessary to use the constructor instead, i.e.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64658
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64658
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 20 11:50:43 2015
New Revision: 219886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219886root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64658
* include/std/atomic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64658
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64658
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Testcase for 4.9 (which doesn't have the fix for PR64940 that allows
std::atomic_int t o be used interchangeably with std::atomicint):
#include atomic
int main()
{
std::atomicint
