[Bug libstdc++/68982] [6 Regression] Missing explicit qualification for std::forward in functional

[rogero at howzatt dot demon.co.uk]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68982

--- Comment #5 from Roger Orr  ---
Thank you ;-)

[Bug libstdc++/68982] [6 Regression] Missing explicit qualification for std::forward in functional

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68982

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 21 14:16:36 2015
New Revision: 231881

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231881=gcc=rev
Log:
Rename test file that had incorrect bug number

PR libstdc++/68982
testsuite/20_util/function_objects/mem_fn/68276.cc: Rename to ...
testsuite/20_util/function_objects/mem_fn/68982.cc: Correct bug number.

Added:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/function_objects/mem_fn/68982.cc
  - copied, changed from r231880,
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/function_objects/mem_fn/68276.cc
Removed:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/function_objects/mem_fn/68276.cc
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog

[Bug libstdc++/68982] [6 Regression] Missing explicit qualification for std::forward in functional

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68982

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
This was fixed at r231879 but I put the wrong bug ID in the changelog so the
commit got logged on Bug 68276. Oops.