[Bug libstdc++/78167] experimental/filesystem calls behave differently between Linux gcc 5.3.0 and Windows Visual Studio 2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- This was Bug 71313 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 71313 ***
[Bug libstdc++/78167] experimental/filesystem calls behave differently between Linux gcc 5.3.0 and Windows Visual Studio 2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'm going to backport all the fixes to the gcc-5-branch soon, so this will be fixed for 5.5
[Bug libstdc++/78167] experimental/filesystem calls behave differently between Linux gcc 5.3.0 and Windows Visual Studio 2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |6.2 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to David Bjornbak from comment #2) > gcc 6.2.0 is Ok for this issue, my unit tests pass. > > Is there's patch available to address this issue with the 5.x versions of > gcc? You can dig into what changes happened to this source but since this is an experimental part of the libstdc++ library I doubt we are going to fix it. We have no guarantees that this library part will even be part of C++17.
[Bug libstdc++/78167] experimental/filesystem calls behave differently between Linux gcc 5.3.0 and Windows Visual Studio 2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167 --- Comment #2 from David Bjornbak --- gcc 6.2.0 is Ok for this issue, my unit tests pass. Is there's patch available to address this issue with the 5.x versions of gcc?
[Bug libstdc++/78167] experimental/filesystem calls behave differently between Linux gcc 5.3.0 and Windows Visual Studio 2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |libstdc++ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you try 6.2?