https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> thanks for fixing this. Shouldn't we keep the PR open, though? It's
> still an ice-on-invalid.
Given that it didn't raise much interest as ice-on-valid-code, I wouldn't
expect it to raise interest as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
Hi Eric,
thanks for fixing this. Shouldn't we keep the PR open, though? It's
still an ice-on-invalid.
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Dec 8 15:52:11 2016
New Revision: 243443
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243443=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/78264
* include/bits/c++config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Still present on Solaris.
Jason,
could you please have a look at this PR? Your patch (r241944)
2016-11-07 Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386-pc-solaris2.12,|i386-pc-solaris2.12,
