[Bug libstdc++/81468] is_constructible gives the wrong answer for time_point construction

2017-07-21 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81468 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler --- Shouldn't add a DR-1177 tag? (I forgot the exact construction pattern for this) This may also help to validate that all other wording changes by this issue had been implemented.

[Bug libstdc++/81468] is_constructible gives the wrong answer for time_point construction

2017-07-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81468 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/81468] is_constructible gives the wrong answer for time_point construction

2017-07-17 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81468 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler --- It seems that the implementation simply forgot to constrain overload resolution, since this is the complete definition of the affected constructor: template constexpr time_point(const time_point