[Bug libstdc++/83830] has_unique_object_representations_v is missing

2018-01-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/83830] has_unique_object_representations_v is missing

2018-01-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Jan 25 15:46:41 2018 New Revision: 257054 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257054&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83830 Define std::has_unique_object_representations_v

[Bug libstdc++/83830] has_unique_object_representations_v is missing

2018-01-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug libstdc++/83830] has_unique_object_representations_v is missing

2018-01-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.3 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakel

[Bug libstdc++/83830] has_unique_object_representations_v is missing

2018-01-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jan 15 15:02:01 2018 New Revision: 256701 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256701&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83830 Define std::has_unique_object_representations_v

[Bug libstdc++/83830] has_unique_object_representations_v is missing

2018-01-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/83830] has_unique_object_representations_v is missing

2018-01-14 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler --- Looks like an oversight on my side when I implemented http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0607r0.html for gcc.