[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2021-03-29 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7dea2f84f26d454331d34b8536c261b6e96205d7 commit r10-9608-g7dea2f84f26d454331d34b8536c261b6e96205d7 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2020-08-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82030d51017323c5706d58d8c8626324ece007e4 commit r11-2913-g82030d51017323c5706d58d8c8626324ece007e4 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2019-05-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2019-05-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue May 7 22:46:39 2019 New Revision: 270987 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270987=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/89102 implement new common_type rules (P0435R1, P0548R1) This change

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2019-05-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue May 7 15:46:44 2019 New Revision: 270968 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270968=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/89102 fix common_type<> and common_type specializations This is a

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2019-02-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2019-02-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |8.3

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2019-02-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Minimal fix committed to trunk, with a complete fix posted to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00346.html for stage 1.

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2019-02-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 6 17:25:26 2019 New Revision: 268586 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268586=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/89102 fix common_type<> and common_type specializations This is a

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2019-02-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- That changed with P0548R1 (which is not a DR).

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

2019-02-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|