[Bug lto/110605] Possible lack of error checking in lto-common.cc ?

2023-07-10 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110605 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 55511 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55511=edit res file

[Bug lto/110605] Possible lack of error checking in lto-common.cc ?

2023-07-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110605 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-07-10

[Bug lto/110605] Possible lack of error checking in lto-common.cc ?

2023-07-09 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110605 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Given the command line: /home/dcb38/gcc/results.20230706.valgrind/bin/gcc cpgarro.o libpgplot.a then I get the valgrind error. I have attached cpgarro.o, but libpgplot.a, even with compression from xz,

[Bug lto/110605] Possible lack of error checking in lto-common.cc ?

2023-07-09 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110605 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 55507 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55507=edit object module

[Bug lto/110605] Possible lack of error checking in lto-common.cc ?

2023-07-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110605 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- most likely not a big issue of not checking the return value here as the next fscanf that is the first thing inside the loop around num_symbols .