https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526
--- Comment #11 from Richard Weickelt ---
I would prefer a warning over an error. Cross-compiling for arm-none-eabi does
work unless floating point arithmetic is involved as reported in bug 105641,
but I understand that this might be a special
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-09-01 19:29:58 |2022-7-4
--- Comment #10 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard at weickelt dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.f.starke at freenet dot
de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
My previous comment was that the *patch* for that old bug was a
host-dependency, so the bug having been closed as fixed suggests that the
issue may be present in the source tree, not that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #3)
> The handling of target options (the patch for bug 45475) is another
> host-dependency in the bytecode stream.
That has been closed as fixed... which parts of
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 19:29 ---
The handling of target options (the patch for bug 45475) is another
host-dependency in the bytecode stream.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 19:50
---
Other portability concerns:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02157.html
The host portability issue with __attribute__ ((visibility (hidden)))
has already been noted. I suggest conditioning the
--- Comment #2 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 20:17
---
More portability concerns from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02157.html
+/* This needs to be included after config.h. Otherwise, _GNU_SOURCE will not
+ be defined in time to set __USE_GNU in
11 matches
Mail list logo