http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-25 10:12:47
UTC ---
> So why doesn't it have DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME set?
No idea. I suppose it is not seen by free_lang_data for whatever reason.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenther at suse dot de|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-16
08:33:30 UTC ---
Quick&dirty workaround for this problem:
Index: lto-symtab.c
===
--- lto-symtab.c(revision 178757)
+++ lto-symtab.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-15 21:39:06 UTC ---
Still further reduction:
class Resource {
};
class BaseReference {
};
template < class interface_type > class Reference:public BaseReference {
public:
void *operator new (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25271|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-14
11:32:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 25271
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25271
More reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-14
07:38:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 25267
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25267
somewhat reducted testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from Jan
11 matches
Mail list logo
