http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
15:31:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 14 15:31:24 2011
New Revision: 182336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182336
Log:
2011-12-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-12-14 15:36:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 26080
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26080
patch candidate
...
The patch fixes this pr without any visible
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-12-12
13:09:49 UTC ---
I can't see any vectorizer differences for the testcase in comment #2 and the
patch you cite only (should) have debuginfo changes, no changes to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-12-12
15:17:19 UTC ---
I can't reproduce anything with the testcase from comment #2.
Sorry for the confusion. The code in comment #2 was here only to show the
actual code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-12-11
14:07:59 UTC ---
Upon further looking at the assembly, I have found that the seven loops in
spmmult are all vectorized without -flto, while none of them are with -flto.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-12-10
18:39:15 UTC ---
The profiles are without -flto:
+ 34.6%, nf3dprecon.2105.constprop.1, a.out
| 34.6%, nf2dprecon.2116, a.out
33.5%, spmmult.2139, a.out
+ 29.8%,
10 matches
Mail list logo