[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

2013-08-06 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

2013-08-05 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30616 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30616action=edit Proposed fix Patch I am testing. The problem was that ltrans passes got overzelaous on

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

2013-08-05 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 --- Comment #12 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Jan, I tried to test your fix and got the following error message while building trunk compiler (with your fix): ../../../../../trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/fstream-inst.cc:48:1:

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

2013-08-05 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Please, let me know if more info is needed. Actually I got the same ICE in meantime. Here is improved patch (it is still testing for me) Index: cgraph.c

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

2013-08-05 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 --- Comment #14 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Hi Jan, I checked that all benches from spec2000 are run successfully with -flto options and eembc_2_0 suite was also run sucessfully with lto (for 32-bit mode). So go ahead and

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

2013-08-04 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

2013-07-22 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

2013-07-22 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com --- And a testcase from PR57879 fails with -O2 / -O1 and -flto, it happens when building GCC itself.

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

2013-07-22 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|