https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #35 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon May 4 10:16:23 2015
New Revision: 222759
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222759root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65559
* lto-wrapper.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #36 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon May 4 10:23:55 2015
New Revision: 222761
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222761root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backmerge from trunk.
PR lto/65559
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #34 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #30)
I'm testing the following instead:
Index: gcc/lto-wrapper.c
===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #33 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
bootstrap-lto fails to build:
`isl_union_map_read_from_str' referenced in section `.text' of
M:\msys64\tmp\cceOtKWH.ltrans0.ltrans.o: defined in discarded section `.text'
of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #31 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23)
The patch looks pretty obvious to me - though I wonder if archives still
work on x86_64-linux after it (or rather I wonder how they
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #32 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
I've been building with just the corrected open call and have successfully
built LTO versions of binutils, mpc, mpfr, isl, libiconv, bzip2, zlib, etc
without any issue but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #30 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
I'm testing the following instead:
Index: gcc/lto-wrapper.c
===
--- gcc/lto-wrapper.c (Revision 222611)
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #20 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
Kai,
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #18)
Does the following patch fixes your problem?
Index: lto-wrapper.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #25 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
Note that the issue should only cause option merging to be skipped for files
in archives (and that, too, on x86_64-linux). Though
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch looks pretty obvious to me - though I wonder if archives still work
on x86_64-linux after it (or rather I wonder how they worked before...).
I'm not aware of @ doing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #22 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I will be able to test this tomorrow (or this evening) for a linux bootstrap.
Patch tested is:
Index: lto-wrapper.c
===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that the issue should only cause option merging to be skipped for files in
archives (and that, too, on x86_64-linux). Though compared to the 4.9 branch
we do
fd =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #21 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
*** Bug 65582 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #26 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
(In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #25)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
Note that the issue should only cause option merging to be skipped for files
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #27 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
The primary differences between the 4.9 branch and 5.1.0 are only that the
underlying issue now results in a fatal error. In the 4.9 branch, the objects
and archives (even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #28 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #26)
(In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #25)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
Note that the issue should only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #29 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
(In reply to Matt Breedlove from comment #28)
If you don't mind, what were the failures you were getting on this one or
did the original reported errors simply return?
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Does the following patch fixes your problem?
Index: lto-wrapper.c
===
--- lto-wrapper.c (Revision 69)
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment
22 matches
Mail list logo
