https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1cc0e9a46e79e7ccc7f904b951e369b2b2647567
commit r13-1791-g1cc0e9a46e79e7ccc7f904b951e369b2b2647567
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9d4c3b45c5ed5f45c8089c990dbd4e181929c3d
commit r13-1762-gf9d4c3b45c5ed5f45c8089c990dbd4e181929c3d
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhongyunde at huawei dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> It seems loop vectorizer assume unroll factor to be number of elemenets,
> similar as groups size for SLP.
> I'm trying to handle them for when scalar type is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
It seems loop vectorizer assume unroll factor to be number of elemenets,
similar as groups size for SLP.
I'm trying to handle them for when scalar type is COMPLEX, not sure if there's
other issues? It looks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target|
