https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
--- Comment #5 from Umesh Kalappa ---
Ok thank you @Jakub and @Andrew for the quick reply ,
>>-Winline
Option triggers this diagnostic ,so it better not to use this option in the
debug build ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, I think -Og only does early inlining and not IPA inlining, so it will
inline far fewer functions than -O1, -O2, -Os etc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also -G and -g are different options. I was thinking you saying gcc should not
warn when you specify the small data size on some targets (-G).
Oh -g is independent from optimization level too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
