https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
--- Comment #12 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #11)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #10)
> > But Zack's reason against using __nonnull is __nonnull may cause unwanted
> > optimizations to *the user code*.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
--- Comment #11 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #10)
> But Zack's reason against using __nonnull is __nonnull may cause unwanted
> optimizations to *the user code*.
GCC already offers options to control function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
--- Comment #10 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #9)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> > > I think a -f... option to disable the code generation effects would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
--- Comment #9 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> > I think a -f... option to disable the code generation effects would make
> > more sense than adding another
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
--- Comment #8 from Alejandro Colomar ---
Test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
--- Comment #7 from Alejandro Colomar ---
Hi Xi, Richard!
On 2023-07-11 10:34, xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
>
> --- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao ---
> Anyway I'm already too frustrated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
--- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> I think a -f... option to disable the code generation effects would make
> more sense than adding another attribute kind.
Then maybe we'd just add a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
I think a -f... option to disable the code generation effects would make more
sense than adding another attribute kind.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla at tecnocode dot
co.uk,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
Alejandro Colomar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alx at kernel dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110617
--- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao ---
[1]:
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Style_and_Conventions#Bugs_in_the_user_program
[2]: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-July/149893.html
12 matches
Mail list logo