--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19920
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 18:27
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-16 11:16
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] build broken on
several targets due to recent 'DC' type update to libgcc2
From: corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While building, I noticed warnings from math
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
15:15 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
From: corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While building, I noticed warnings from math code in newlib, I haven't
noticed before. I am not sure whether these
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-16 15:56
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] build broken on
several targets due to recent 'DC' type update to libgcc2
Like ...?
Here's one (target: h8300-rtems4.7):
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
22:55 ---
Subject: Bug 19920
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-16 22:55:34
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog libgcc2.c libgcc2.h
Log
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15
20:42 ---
A call for testing patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00858.html.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de
2005-02-15 23:24 ---
FYI: I have just tested the patch posted in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00858.html
After applying this patch, the build for the avr target again succeeds.
Yours,
Björn
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
07:35 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
A call for testing patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00858.html.
With this patch applied, GCC-4.0 (20050216) builds again for
avr-rtems* and
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-14
15:14 ---
None of the primary/secondary targets are known to fail so removing the target
milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-14 20:32
---
(In reply to comment #9)
None of the primary/secondary targets are known to fail so removing the
target milestone.
Although I understand none of the failures are on primary/secondary targets,
might someone
--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de
2005-02-14 22:21 ---
FYI,
I have just posted a RFC on gcc@gcc.gnu.org concerning implementation of a
target-specific mode-substitution convention. Hopefully someone competent will
answer.
Yours,
Björn.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
