[Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC.

2012-01-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20675 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC.

2007-11-15 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 15:39 --- What happened to this patch? -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC.

2007-11-15 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 15 Nov 2007 15:39:19 - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC. --- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 15:39 --- What happened

[Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC.

2005-03-29 Thread ericw at evcohs dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||ericw at evcohs dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20675

[Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC.

2005-03-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29 00:25 --- Note all patches should always goto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC.

2005-03-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29 00:26 --- Also note that the dwarf-2 unwinder needs to be 64bit the last time I looked (I think it is defined by the dwarf-2 standard). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20675

[Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC.

2005-03-28 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-29 00:28 --- Subject: Re: Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC. Note all patches should always goto gcc-patches ok, just sent. --

[Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC.

2005-03-28 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-29 01:14 --- Subject: Re: Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC. Also note that the dwarf-2 unwinder needs to be 64bit the last time I looked (I think it is defined by the dwarf-2

[Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC.

2005-03-28 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-29 02:09 --- Subject: Re: Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC. Also note that the dwarf-2 unwinder needs to be 64bit the last time I looked (I think it is defined by the dwarf-2

[Bug middle-end/20675] Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC.

2005-03-28 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-29 03:42 --- Subject: Re: Small targets without 64 bit long long support are can't bootstrap GCC. Static debug data should be based on it's required encoding specification, and have nothing to do with a target's