--- Comment #9 from robert dot nagy at gmail dot com 2006-10-18 22:06
---
Hi.
I'd like to backport the fix of this problem to OpenBSD because we still use
gcc 3.3 here and we are not able to compile OpenOffice w/o fixing this.
If someone can point me to the change you guys made I'd
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 22:09
---
(In reply to comment #9)
If someone can point me to the change you guys made I'd really appriciate it.
There have been too many changes to figure out what fixed this really and 3.3
is no longer being maintained
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 20:24 ---
No working test case, no feedback for two months - no reason to keep this
open.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from dwmw2 at infradead dot org 2006-09-21 20:38 ---
Apologies -- GCC bugzilla mail was going missing due to being sent with a bogus
sender address. Will dig out a current test case if it's still an issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826
--- Comment #6 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-07-22 21:16 ---
Waiting on David's feedback.
--
echristo at apple dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-10 12:19 ---
It doesn't compile with 4.1 either due to errors. Can you re-do preprocessed
source for 4.1 and possibly mainline?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|4.0 regression: excessive |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|compiler resource usage
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:02 ---
This was a P2 before P3 was default. Also I mentioned this was much improved
on the mainline which might mean this was fixed but I don't have a place to
test it
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
