[Bug middle-end/22072] bizarre code for int*int/2 for -Os

2009-10-15 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #18 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-10-15 18:04 --- Backport approved offline by Vlad. Fixed. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/22072] bizarre code for int*int/2 for -Os

2009-10-08 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-10-08 08:17 --- Vlad, is it OK if I backport this patch to 4.4? I have tested it on 4.4 without problems. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22072

[Bug middle-end/22072] bizarre code for int*int/2 for -Os

2009-10-07 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 17:18 --- Subject: Bug 22072 Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Oct 7 17:18:38 2009 New Revision: 152533 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152533 Log: 2009-10-07 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com

[Bug middle-end/22072] bizarre code for int*int/2 for -Os

2009-10-06 Thread vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment #14 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2009-10-06 21:59 --- IRA does not create a conflict for p66 and p67 (in function triangle). One pseudo is earlyclobber. They should have a conflict. Therefore p67 gets wrong hard register and reload fixes this by generation of

[Bug middle-end/22072] bizarre code for int*int/2 for -Os

2008-09-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-14 04:28 --- a1 (r65,l0) best GENERAL_REGS, cover GENERAL_REGS If IRA chose CREG instead of GENERAL_REGS, it would have been right. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/22072] bizarre code for int*int/2 for -Os

2008-09-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-14 04:30 --- *** Bug 27856 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/22072] bizarre code for int*int/2 for -Os

2006-09-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 01:24 --- So the only bug here is that -Os produces an extra move. That comes from the register allocator/reload: Reloads for insn # 13 Reload 0: reload_in (SI) = (reg:SI 1 dx [65]) GENERAL_REGS, RELOAD_FOR_INPUT