http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
--- Comment #20 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jye2
Date: Thu Feb 27 07:28:06 2014
New Revision: 208195
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208195root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-02-27 Joey Ye joey...@arm.com
Backport mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
--- Comment #18 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Wed Dec 11 16:50:05 2013
New Revision: 205896
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205896root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-12-11 Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
--- Comment #19 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Wed Dec 11 16:59:24 2013
New Revision: 205897
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205897root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-12-11 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
--- Comment #17 from Sandra Loosemore sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
Updated patch series:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg02057.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg02058.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
--- Comment #16 from Sandra Loosemore sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
Patch that fixes regression posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00750.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
Sandra Loosemore sandra at codesourcery dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra
--- Comment #12 from frikkie at zitera dot co dot za 2009-01-13 10:12
---
Created an attachment (id=17085)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17085action=view)
patch_for_volatile_bitfields_gcc400.tgz
The following patches help to honour the container type of the
--- Comment #13 from frikkie at zitera dot co dot za 2009-01-13 10:42
---
Please note: The patch was for GCC 4.4.0, not GCC 4.0.0 as mentioned in the
previous post.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
--- Comment #14 from frikkie at zitera dot co dot za 2009-01-13 15:51
---
Created an attachment (id=17087)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17087action=view)
GCC 4.3.2 patch for volatile bitfields
The following patches help to honour the container type of the
--- Comment #11 from jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com
2006-08-02 11:30 ---
*** Bug 28568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
--- Comment #9 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 15:21 ---
Subject: Bug 23623
Author: pbrook
Date: Wed Mar 29 15:21:13 2006
New Revision: 112493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112493
Log:
2006-03-29 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 17:44 ---
Should be fixed now.
--
pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 18:03 ---
Subject: Bug 23623
Author: pbrook
Date: Tue Mar 28 18:03:06 2006
New Revision: 112460
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112460
Log:
2006-03-28 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Additional Comments From m dot reszat at kostal dot com 2005-09-08
15:12 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
I will try and dig up the EABI for PowerPC
Note this also happens on ARM where (in the EABI) it is definitely a bug
None of the documents I found
--- Additional Comments From m dot reszat at kostal dot com 2005-08-30
07:43 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
Access to bf1.b is correctly done as 32-bits (lwz/stw opcodes), bf2.b is
accessed as 8-bits (lbz/stb opcodes). GCC3.4.3 shows the same behaviour,
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-08-30 12:26
---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
When dealing with peripherals in embedded systems, the use of bitfields makes
the code much more readable.
I can see that.
Most
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-30
12:43 ---
Note this also happens on ARM where (in the EABI) it is definitely a bug becuase
the procedure call standard says it is.
Quoting from the AAPCS:
7.1.7.5 Volatile bit-fields#63719;preserving number and
--- Additional Comments From m dot reszat at kostal dot com 2005-08-30
13:40 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Note this also happens on ARM where (in the EABI) it is definitely a bug
I will try and dig up the EABI for PowerPC, but it's not just about sticking to
a paper. It simply does
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-30
14:00 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I will try and dig up the EABI for PowerPC, but it's not just about sticking
to
a paper. It simply does not work for me (and probably others) the way it is.
Saying that
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||3.1 3.3 4.1.0 4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-08-29 21:10
---
(In reply to comment #0)
Access to bf1.b is correctly done as 32-bits (lwz/stw opcodes), bf2.b is
accessed as 8-bits (lbz/stb opcodes). GCC3.4.3 shows the same behaviour, can't
go back any further. The same
23 matches
Mail list logo
