--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 04:02 ---
Fixed in 4.0.3.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from kumba at gentoo dot org 2005-12-16 00:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=10506)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10506action=view)
Expected Results
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437
--- Comment #2 from kumba at gentoo dot org 2005-12-16 00:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=10507)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10507action=view)
What Really Happens
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437
--- Comment #3 from kumba at gentoo dot org 2005-12-16 00:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=10508)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10508action=view)
Testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437
--- Comment #4 from kumba at gentoo dot org 2005-12-16 00:47 ---
Forgot to add, the failure itself was traceable to the RC5_32_set_key()
function in rc5_skey.c in the original files. In the attached testcase, the
function in question begins on Line #554.
--
--- Comment #5 from kumba at gentoo dot org 2005-12-16 00:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=10509)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10509action=view)
Preprocessed Output of testcase at -O0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437
--- Comment #6 from kumba at gentoo dot org 2005-12-16 00:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=10510)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10510action=view)
Preprocessed Output of testcase at -O1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437
--- Comment #7 from kumba at gentoo dot org 2005-12-16 01:55 ---
Got a confirmation the issue exists on Linux/Sparc as well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437
