http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32964
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7
---
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:11
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-06 12:09
---
New SRA scalarizes the unions in this testcase and so this is no
longer a 4.5 regression. I have committed a testcase for reference
and am updating relevant bugzilla tags/summary now.
As I won't be backporting
--- Comment #13 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-06 21:45
---
Indeed, this testcase is fully scalarized by the new SRA even as it is
today. (If you don't know what new SRA I mean, I hope I'll post it to
the list as an RFC next week).
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-01 08:07 ---
still present.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-03-25
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-01 10:40
---
New SRA should fix this.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:19
---
GCC 4.3.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:02 ---
4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-14 16:57 ---
This could be fixed by MEM_REF (but we don't lower struct copies at the moment,
doh!), or by tweaking SCCVN/FRE to also look at struct copies.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
