Jakub wrote: > BTW, omp workshare is implemented the same as omp single and this is the > first time I see somebody actually using that construct anywhere. I don't > have plans to implement omp workshare more efficiently, at least in the > foreseeable future. So ATM !$omp parallel workshare is just a fancy > way to say something is not parallelized. It is standard conforming, but > not going beyond that.
Seemingly it becomes more requested. The quote above comes from: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-02/msg00137.html and it was requested also in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-03/msg00008.html -- Summary: Implement OpenMP workshare Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openmp Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35423
