--- Comment #7 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-11-20 19:05 ---
gcc.dg/20020425-1.c is a separate issue where the 'remove useless statements'
pass is very slow. I will add some comments to that bug report soon if I can't
come up with a fix.
Resolving this report as fixed.
--
sje
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-20
18:59 ---
Subject: Re: limits-fnargs.c takes very long time to compile at -O2
> --- Comment #5 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-11-20 18:30 ---
> The limits-fnargs.c tests pass on my IA64 platforms (HP-U
--- Comment #5 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-11-20 18:30 ---
The limits-fnargs.c tests pass on my IA64 platforms (HP-UX and Linux). It
still failed on hppa64-*-hpux* with a timeout but my PA box is quite slow and I
have other tests timing out there as well. I am willing to call i
--- Comment #4 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-19 21:22
---
Subject: Bug 37790
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 19 21:20:44 2008
New Revision: 142017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142017
Log:
2008-11-15 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 19:49 ---
Subject: Bug 37790
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Nov 16 19:47:40 2008
New Revision: 141924
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141924
Log:
2008-11-16 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR bootstr
--- Comment #2 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-11-16 16:14 ---
I waited more than hour to compile it on 1.2Ghz itanium and canceled the
compilation. The problem is in coalescing stack slots. The code was already
rewritten for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-08 00:55 ---
The same problem is present on hppa64.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
